O
Missouri City
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Aisha Islamic Center Replat

Missouri City

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (15)

At a glance

Public comments
17
Last 30 days
17

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 14, 2026.

Public comments (17)

SupportiveShehzad ChatriwalaOct 14, 2026

Expressed support for the Aisha Islamic Center, emphasizing its role as a community center providing food bank support and hurricane shelters.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 11:57 →
OpposedDr. Jim WethornOct 14, 2026

Argued against the project due to floodplain challenges, narrow roads, and severe emergency response delays.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 11:28 →
OpposedPatty NewtonOct 14, 2026

Highlighted major traffic increases on Watts Road and expressed deep concern over public safety and wildlife.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 17:24 →
OpposedRalph Sr.Oct 14, 2026

Questioned the zoning history and expressed concern over falling property values adjacent to the property.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 19:00 →
OpposedMichelle Laird WilliamsOct 14, 2026

Protested the replat, questioning the scale of the project, commercial septic viability, and traffic infrastructure.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 20:53 →
OpposedLisa CaduOct 14, 2026

Urged the commission to uphold neighborhood standards, require city sewer connections, and protect wetlands and historic cemeteries.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 24:21 →
OpposedLily CaduOct 14, 2026

Expressed worries about septic tanks contaminating drinking water and endangering the neighborhood.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 26:40 →
OpposedJanelle RussellOct 14, 2026

Cited fatal accidents on Watts Road and warned of health hazards and traffic congestion from quadrupling attendance.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 27:37 →
OpposedDenisiya AbeyratnaOct 14, 2026

Argued that the replat violates the 2021 SUP limits and noted discrepancies in attendance numbers between city filings and marketing materials.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 30:10 →
OpposedDharma AbeyratnaOct 14, 2026

Requested a traffic impact study, geotechnical assessment, and wetlands evaluation due to drainage and land subsidence concerns.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 33:10 →
OpposedSaman AbeyratnaOct 14, 2026

Expressed concern over flooding, private well contamination, and potential odor issues from wastewater treatment.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 36:28 →
OpposedJulie BaronOct 14, 2026

Requested a traffic impact study and urged the commission to deny the request to protect residential property values and safety.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 39:55 →
OpposedJames TharpOct 14, 2026

Stated that circumventing permanent infrastructure requirements with temporary systems is poor practice and sets up the project for failure.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 43:05 →
OpposedTiarra BlueOct 14, 2026

Emphasized traffic issues and cautioned against setting a negative precedent by piecemeal zoning approvals.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 44:50 →
OpposedKen HamlinOct 14, 2026

Expressed frustration over repeated zoning battles and urged the board to vote no on the proposal.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 46:54 →
OpposedMichelle TolbertOct 14, 2026

Echoed concerns over traffic, commercial septic systems, and protecting clean drinking water.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 49:05 →
SupportiveSalim ObeidOct 14, 2026

Spoke as the project civil engineer, clarifying that the property is in Zone X, connects to city water, and will use an inspected residential-grade septic system until public sewer is available.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Oct 14 2026 · 51:57 →